From cb86d1f837f8f8c40e8b00c9c29d136ed6a16a08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Khem Raj Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 17:32:13 -0800 Subject: clang: Do not lock clang as only cross compiler option clang might be used for more than just static compiler on target and therefore lock-stepping it with needing clang cross-compiler is not right thing Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-devtools/clang/clang_git.bb | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'recipes-devtools/clang/clang_git.bb') diff --git a/recipes-devtools/clang/clang_git.bb b/recipes-devtools/clang/clang_git.bb index 86d8ddd..eef043c 100644 --- a/recipes-devtools/clang/clang_git.bb +++ b/recipes-devtools/clang/clang_git.bb @@ -238,6 +238,5 @@ INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-lldb-python += "dev-so dev-deps" #Avoid SSTATE_SCAN_COMMAND running sed over llvm-config. SSTATE_SCAN_FILES_remove = "*-config" -TOOLCHAIN = "clang" TOOLCHAIN_class-native = "gcc" TOOLCHAIN_class-nativesdk = "clang" -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf