summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* oeqa: runtime: java: skip java7 comp test for ppcRichard Leitner2018-10-021-0/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* conf: distro: add mejate{,-musl} distributionsRichard Leitner2018-10-022-0/+13
| | | | | | | Add meta-java test distributions for glibc and musl. Those should be used for oeqa tests of the *-test-image's to cover also musl. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* oeqa: runtime: java: enable test_java8_jar_comp_mode for armv7Richard Leitner2018-10-022-3/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As commit "openjdk-8: add aarch32 port 8u172b11" introduced support for the aarch32 port of openjdk-8 enable the test_java8_jar_comp_mode test for ARMv7 machines. This is done by skipping the test only for machines which have armv{4-6} in their tunes. Furthermore update the "Known Limitations" section in the README. This patch depends on OE-Core rev 10b935c713748346aea6c36c2f41e0ae6c320821, named "oeqa/core/decorator: add skipIfInDataVar" Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Acked-by: Henning Heinold <henning@itconsulting-heinold.de>
* icedtea: disable error format-overflow for gcc 7Andreas Obergschwandtner2018-10-022-0/+43
| | | | | | | | | | As no patch has been found in debian and hotspot repo for this issue we just disable this warning which was introduced with GCC 7. Also known as: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881824 Signed-off-by: Andreas Obergschwandtner <andreas.obergschwandtner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-7: merge postinst into openjdk-7-commonRichard Leitner2018-10-022-101/+99
| | | | | | | | | | As openjdk-7-common was the only consumer of openjdk-postinst.inc move it's content and remove openjdk-postinst.inc. Now all files in recipes-core/openjdk are named correctly according to their versions again. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: use openjdk-commonRichard Leitner2018-10-021-6/+1
| | | | | | | | As openjdk-common.inc now serves all OpenJDK version let openjdk-8-common require it. Furthermore remove the now duplicated lines. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-7: remove version dependent stuff from openjdk-commonRichard Leitner2018-10-022-37/+38
| | | | | | | Move the OpenJDK-7 specific parts from openjdk-common.inc to openjdk-7-common.inc. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* icedtea7-native: use openjdk_build_helper's ARCH translation functionsRichard Leitner2018-10-021-39/+3
| | | | | | | As the openjdk_build_helper now provides the ARCH translation function use those and drop the local ones. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-7: use openjdk_build_helper's ARCH translation functionsRichard Leitner2018-10-022-41/+2
| | | | | | | | | As the openjdk_build_helper now provides the ARCH translation function use those and drop the local ones. Furthermore remove the duplicated LLVM_CONFIGURE_ARCH export. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: use openjdk_build_helper's ARCH translation functionsRichard Leitner2018-10-021-40/+3
| | | | | | | As the openjdk_build_helper now provides the ARCH translation function use those and drop the local ones. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-build-helper: add get_*_arch functionsRichard Leitner2018-10-021-0/+51
| | | | | | | | As different parts of OpenJDK use sightly different names for ARCH'es we provide those translations functions centrally in our openjdk-build-helper class. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: add aarch32 port 8u172b11André Draszik2018-10-0217-98/+416
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to the aarch64 build, we import the specific aarch32 port when building for ARMv7. We also add all the necessary patches to: * compile using gcc v8 * compile against musl This was tested on: * QEMU with cortex A7 emulation (using glibc) * real hardware (using musl) Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: allow to build client JVM via PACKAGECONFIGAndré Draszik2018-08-211-0/+2
| | | | | | | The aarch32 port will need to unconditionally enable this. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
* openjdk-8: always apply some patchesAndré Draszik2018-08-212-3/+2
| | | | | | | As a simplification for the upcoming aarch32 port. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
* openjdk-8: fix malformed patchesAndré Draszik2018-08-2116-32/+32
| | | | | | | | | | | | | git am complains: Warning: commit message did not conform to UTF-8. You may want to amend it after fixing the message, or set the config variable i18n.commitencoding to the encoding your project uses. Not sure what happened there when they were applied to git, they certainly weren't sent like that to the mailing list. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
* layer.conf: stop OpenJDK-8(native) build dependencies from being installedAndré Draszik2018-08-211-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Avoid installation of all openjdk-8-native buildtime dependencies into a depending recipe's sysroot. To execute openjdk-8-native as part of a depending recipe's build, we don't need the openjdk-8-native build time dependencies (like ant-native, or more importantly icedtea-7-native), just its runtime dependencies, unless of course that depending recipe's builds needs those tools itself. In that case, it needs to specify them explicitly, though (of course!). Use SSTATE_EXCLUDEDEPS_SYSROOT to prevent openjdk-8-native build time dependencies from being copied in the sysroot unless explicitly requested. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
* README: add "Known Limitations/Bugs" sectionRichard Leitner2018-08-201-0/+19
| | | | | | | | Add a section containing our currently known limitations. This includes OpenJDK version-target combinations which only support "interpreted mode". Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: gcc-8 fix #4: undefined behaviour (hotspot)André Draszik2018-08-1411-2/+673
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using gcc-8, Hotspot is being miscompiled, resulting in non- working binaries. The reason is undefined behaviour, which gcc-8 even warns about and errors out. We have so far have taped over those warnings, but it turns out that we simply cannot do that. Add patches to address undefined behaviour causing miscompilation of hotsport. This also means we can remove the -Wno-error=return-type C compiler flag again which was recently added in error in commit 52fb41cec7d5 ("openjdk-8: fix build for gcc8.x") only hiding the compiler warnings/errors that were flagging the incorrect code in the first place. With these patches applied, the openjdk-8 ARM port works again: | RESULTS: | RESULTS - ping.PingTest.test_ping - Testcase 964: PASSED (0.04s) | RESULTS - ssh.SSHTest.test_ssh - Testcase 224: PASSED (0.68s) | RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_exists - Testcase -1: PASSED (0.14s) | RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_comp_mode - Testcase -1: FAILED (5.13s) | RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_int_mode - Testcase -1: PASSED (4.48s) | RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_works - Testcase -1: PASSED (4.44s) | RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_version - Testcase -1: PASSED (3.66s) | RESULTS - javac.JavacTest.test_javac_exists - Testcase -1: PASSED (0.13s) | RESULTS - javac.JavacTest.test_javac_works - Testcase -1: PASSED (30.87s) | SUMMARY: | openjdk-8-test-image () - Ran 9 tests in 50.263s The java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_comp_mode failure can be ignored for now, as that test verifies compiled mode which is not available on arm. The testcase must be fixed instead. (We need to refresh one unrelated existing patch to avoid patch fuzz warnings) Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* oeqa: runtime: java: skip not supported version/arch combinationsRichard Leitner2018-08-141-1/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The following OpenJDK Version/Target architecture combinations are currently not supported with "compiled mode" aka JIT: OpenJRE-8 on arm OpenJDK-7 on aarch64 OpenJDK-7 on x86 OpenJDK-7 on x86-64 Therefore we skip the correspoding oeqa runtime tests for now. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* dbus-java: do not build any documentationYevgeny Popovych2018-08-141-20/+2
| | | | | | | Support for respective docbook tools has been removed in pyro release. Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Popovych <yevgenyp@pointgrab.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-build-helper: move c compiler flags retrieval to here (from openjdk-8)André Draszik2018-08-132-41/+39
| | | | | | | | | | Icedtea 7 and OpenJDK 7 will need to apply new compiler flags for certain compiler version without breaking support for older (host) compilers. Move here so that the same code can be re-used. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* java.bbclass: move openjdk/icedtea specific code into new classAndré Draszik2018-08-138-21/+23
| | | | | | | | | | The code moved is not relevant to anything using java, just for compiling java itself. It doesn't make sense to have here. Move it into openjdk-build-helper Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-7: clarify a bitbake warningRichard Leitner2018-08-131-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We get a bitbake warning during recipe building complaining about unsupported architectures unconditionally. That check is relevant only for shark builds, so it is quite confusing for non-shark builds. Make the warning conditional on whether shark builds are enabled or not. This is the same patch as the one for openjdk-8 by André Draszik (commit 86c729cb51f880fd5a1ec6485baddfa2bedaa998) Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Acked-by: Henning Heinold <henning@itconsulting-heinold.de>
* openjdk-8: update to 8u172b11André Draszik2018-08-138-90/+75
| | | | | Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: gcc-8 fix #3: working binariesAndré Draszik2018-08-131-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to the existing gcc-6 and gcc-7 support, we need to add the same specific compiler flags to avoid miscompilation on gcc-8: -fno-lifetime-dse -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks With this, bitbake -c testimage openjdk-8-test-image works again for x86_64 and aarch64: RESULTS: RESULTS - ping.PingTest.test_ping - Testcase 964: PASSED (0.12s) RESULTS - ssh.SSHTest.test_ssh - Testcase 224: PASSED (1.20s) RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_exists - Testcase -1: PASSED (0.15s) RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_comp_mode - Testcase -1: PASSED (41.98s) RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_int_mode - Testcase -1: PASSED (1.76s) RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_jar_works - Testcase -1: PASSED (2.13s) RESULTS - java.JavaTest.test_java_version - Testcase -1: PASSED (1.51s) RESULTS - javac.JavacTest.test_javac_exists - Testcase -1: PASSED (0.11s) RESULTS - javac.JavacTest.test_javac_works - Testcase -1: PASSED (17.64s) SUMMARY: openjdk-8-test-image () - Ran 9 tests in 67.112s openjdk-8-test-image - OK - All required tests passed NOTE: armv5e still doesn't work with gcc v8, and other arches weren't tested. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: gcc-8 fix #2: silence build warnings/errors (return-type)André Draszik2018-08-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to the patch just reverted, we silence the build warnings regarding return type of functions, but we only do this for gcc versions where it matters, now that our infrastructure for doing so works again: | <<PKGBUILDDIR>>/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp:223:32: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] | #define BREAKPOINT ::breakpoint() | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~ | <<PKGBUILDDIR>>/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/debug.hpp:192:3: note: in expansion of macro 'BREAKPOINT' | BREAKPOINT; \ | ^~~~~~~~~~ | <<PKGBUILDDIR>>/hotspot/src/cpu/aarch64/vm/c1_LIRAssembler_aarch64.cpp:197:2: note: in expansion of macro 'ShouldNotReachHere' | ShouldNotReachHere(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ etc. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* Revert "openjdk-8: fix build for gcc8.x"André Draszik2018-08-132-22/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 52fb41cec7d5125bb11c718705158696ffef11f8. The change being reverted has two problems: - it still doesn't produce working binaries - compilation on pre-gcc v7 compilers fails (which is relevant for compiling openjdk-8-native, as that uses the build machine's gcc, not yocto's gcc): | At global scope: | cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-stringop-overflow’ [-Werror] | cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors We now use a different approach to address the issues than that patch, and it is thusly not needed anymore. We fully support gcc < 7 again. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: gcc-8 fix #1: backport patch to fix misuses of strncpy/strncatAndré Draszik2018-08-132-0/+182
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The original approach doesn't work with all compilers, as not all compilers support the flag used to suppress the warnings / errors. This patch here avoids passing unsupported compiler options into older compilers, and at the same time fixes the bugs, rather than just silencing the compiler. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: fix infrastructure for version host gcc != cross gcc (again)André Draszik2018-08-132-25/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Building OpenJDK-8 (target) with an older host compiler (gcc < 6) does not work as the build errors with error messages regarding unrecognized gcc command line options. As part of the (cross) build particularly, OpenJDK-8 builds a host tool (adlc) using the host gcc. We have a patch, openjdk8-fix-adlc-flags.patch, that tries to make the adlc build use the correct / intended compiler flags. This doesn't work right now, as that build still sees compiler flags intended for / understood by the gcc version used for the actual cross compile only. The reason is that while we have infrastructure in place to add compiler flags based on the compiler version, we add all of them unconditionally to CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS directly but above patch uses TARGET_CFLAGS / TARGET_CXXFLAGS to filter out unwanted BUILD_CFLAGS / BUILD_CXXFLAGS from CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS, In other words above patch cannot do what it intends to do and all compiler version specific flags (-fno-lifetime-dse & -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks) end up in CFLAGS / CXXFLAGS. So far, this was only affecting people using host gcc < 6, but upcoming patches adding support for gcc >= 8 will add even more compiler flags that even gcc < 7 don't support - it's time to finally address this. We fix the issue by adding the compiler version specific flags to BUILD_CFLAGS / BUILD_CXXFLAGS and TARGET_CFLAGS / TARGET_CXXFLAGS as necessary, so that above patch can work as intended. We now support all necessary combinations: * -native builds * -target builds * host tools built using the native compiler during the -target build A similar but different patch existed here before as commit 6801f6d4e19c ("openjdk-8-common: Fix the issue of building failed adlc on host with gcc < 6") but was reverted subsequently due to reportedly still(?) having (new?) issues with older compilers. This patch here is different from the older patch in that it *doesn't* set the cflags during a python_anonymous() function, and thus it guarantees deterministic execution order. This change here was tested to work using host gcc versions 4.8.4 and 6.3.0 and 7.3.0 Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: remove superfluous compiler flag (-std=gnu++98)André Draszik2018-08-131-1/+0
| | | | | | | | These days, OpenJDK-8 adds this to the build itself, no need to do it again here in the recipe. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: speed-up do_install() (pack200)André Draszik2018-08-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We run pack200 sequentially on all found archives, but there doesn't seem to be a reason to do so, the java_get_parallel_make() apperas to be related to compiling java itself, running multiple java applications (pack200) at the same time on the same machine should be possible, otherwise we have a big problem... Just run up to BB_NUMBER_THREADS pack200 processes at the same time to speed up the build. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* gitignore: ignore new python byte-code filesAndré Draszik2018-08-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Since we run oeqa tests, we get python byte-code in the source tree here. Ignore them to clean-up the git status Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* ca-certificates-java: update to v20180516André Draszik2018-08-022-2/+1
| | | | | | | | This is the latest available version and contains some fixes for Java 10 & Java 11 Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: 'do_unpack_remove_X11_wrappers' confuses pyro bitbake parserMatthew McClain2018-07-311-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | When building without X11 support on the sumo or master branches of meta-java with the pyro branch of poky, meta-oe, etc, the recipe fails to parse. Renaming the function to anything else allows the recipe to be parsed. The problem appears to be the word "_remove_". Signed-off-by: Matthew McClain <mmcclain@uplogix.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: correct the typo mistakefan.xin2018-07-101-1/+1
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Fan Xin <fan.xin@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* README: add "Testing" sectionRichard Leitner2018-06-191-0/+16
| | | | | | | Add new "Testing" section in README where we describe how meta-java tests may be used. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* images/classes: add open{jdk,jre}-{7,8} testRichard Leitner2018-06-196-0/+26
| | | | | | | Add image classes and images for open{jdk,jre}-{7,8} oeqa tests. These will be the basis for future "quality gates". Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* oeqa: runtime: add java & javac testcasesRichard Leitner2018-06-194-0/+100
| | | | | | | These testcases verify that java and javac are working. They will be used as "quality-gate" test for accepting patches in the future. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* classpath: harmonise -native and -initial-native recipesAndré Draszik2018-06-193-59/+51
| | | | | | | | removing lots of code-duplication Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* set SUMMARY instead of DESCRIPTIONAndré Draszik2018-06-1951-54/+54
| | | | | | | | | Short descriptions should go into SUMMARY (DESCRIPTION will get the same value if not set.) Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* libecj-bootstrap-native: simplify buildAndré Draszik2018-06-191-18/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Piping 'find' output into multiple files to re-read them seems inelegant and is error prone - just use a pipe with appropriate options instead. This avoids potential problems with funny file names, and now also makes use of BB_NUMBER_THREADS to speed up compilation. This is a better example to copy from now... Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* docs: add bootstrap-flow.txtAndré Draszik2018-06-191-0/+37
| | | | | | | | | Summarises the bootstrap of the java envrionment, rather than having to find this described in some wiki page that was copied over from OE-classic and never updated. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: give downloaded files a more descriptive nameAndré Draszik2018-06-192-15/+23
| | | | | | | | | | Rather than using the HG (mercurial) changeset IDs directly, add a more descriptive part to the file name. This can help with download cache management. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* ca-certificates-java: update SRC_URIRichard Leitner2018-06-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | Debian changed the URI of the ca-certificates-java repository, therfore use the new one. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: fix build for gcc8.xRichard Leitner2018-06-152-0/+22
| | | | | | | | Currently oe-core/YoctoProject migrated to gcc8.x. This update broke our openjdk-8 and openjre-8 build. This patch avoids this problem by disabling the problematic gcc warnings and errors. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: remove redunant FILES_${PN}-dbgWenlin Kang2018-06-151-29/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable PACKAGES. Comments(oe-core's commit a3b000643898d7402b9e57c02e8d10e677cc9722) from Ross Burton as below: "meta: more removals of redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg In some recipes overly-split -dbg packages were merged into PN-dbg. Unless there's a very good reason, recipes should have a single -dev and -dbg package. " Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* openjdk-8: remove debuglinkWenlin Kang2018-06-151-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During openjdk-8 compiling, its debug file is xxx.debuginfo, and it will add libjvm.debuginfo as libjvm.so's debuglink section's file name, this name is different with that we will create and add in splitdebuginfo() of package.bbclass, in oe-core, the debug file name is the same with the corresponding executable file or library file, this will make we can't get symbol information when debug libjvm.so in gdb, so we must remove the previous debuglink before add it if it has existed(if a file has contained the debuglink section, it will not be changed when add again). Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* jdepend: Retrieve source from Git rather than tarballMike Crowe2018-06-151-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When Bitbake downloads jdepend-2.9.1.zip itself and I download https://github.com/clarkware/jdepend/blob/master/dist/jdepend-2.9.1.zip , the calculated hashes don't match the ones included in the recipe. The hashes were last changed in commit dd5c43fca8289b8795a9214aee616775e1493109 on 1st March, but GitHub claims that the file being downloaded was published on 20th January, so I can't explain why they are wrong. Ross Burton has provided a plausible reason in http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-September/114916.html where he also advocates switching to using Git repositories rather than GitHub-generated tarballs. It seems that we can't really rely on these tarballs to remain unchanged, so let's download the Git hash that corresponds to v2.9.1 instead. This should always remain valid. Cc: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Cc: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com> Tested-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
* ca-certificates-java: add recipe to generate trustStoreAndré Draszik2018-06-123-0/+214
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The OpenJDK-8 package currently comes with a trustStore that was generated at OpenJDK-8-native build time from *all* certificates available in the system, not just from those that are marked as trusted. This isn't right... So this recipe hooks into the ca-certificates package and (re-) creates the Java trustStore based on the certificates trusted by the system, whenever they are updated. This works both at image build time, as well as during runtime on the target. It works by installing a hook into ca-certificates' $SYSROOT/etc/ca-certificates/update.d/ that is passed the added/removed certificates as arguments. That hook is then updating the Java trustStore and storing it in $SYSROOT/etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts. The whole idea as well as the implementation of the hook is borrowed from debian's ca-certificate-java package, version 20170930 (the latest as of this commit). Looking at the debian package, it appears like the same binary trustStore ($SYSROOT/etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts) can be used by different versions of Java: * OpenJDK-7, 8, 9 * Oracle Java 7, 8, 9 The Java sources here can be compiled by any compatible Java compiler, but the resulting jar file should only be run by one of the compatible Java versions mentioned above, so as to create a trustStore that can be read by any of the Java versions mentioned above. We try to ensure this using PACKAGE_WRITE_DEPS during image build time, and by trying to find a compatible Java version inside ${libdir_jvm} at runtime both during image build time and on the target. Given there is nothing that we can RDEPENDS on that would satisfy any of the above Java versions (either JDK or JRE), we simply RDEPENDS on java2-runtime, and test PREFERRED_RPROVIDER_java2-runtime to be satisfactory. Given I can only test OpenJDK/OpenJRE 8 at the moment, only those are actually allowed at the moment, though. This can easily be extended upon confirmation. Final note - as per the debian package, there are three cases when we can be called: 1) as part of update-ca-certificates -> add / remove certs as instructed 2) if first time install -> add all certs 3) package update -> do nothing We have no way to easily distinguish between first time install and package update in OE, so the distinction between cases 2) and 3) isn't perfect. Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
* layer.conf: add ca-certificates-java to SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFEAndré Draszik2018-06-121-0/+4
| | | | | | | Same as ca-certificates in openembedded-core Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf (git 2.39.0) at 2025-05-14 03:10:22 +0000