Remove toolchain-layer

Just including the toolchain-layer in a bblayers.conf results in:
  ERROR: ExpansionError during parsing .../meta-oe/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.6.bb: Failure expanding variable SRCPV, expression was ${@bb.fetch2.get_srcrev(d)} which triggered exception FetchError: Fetcher failure: SRCREV was used yet no valid SCM was found in SRC_URI

Since there is no maintainer, remove it from meta-openembedded.

Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/files/gfortran-4.3.x.patch b/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/files/gfortran-4.3.x.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 0c42851ce1..0000000000
--- a/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/files/gfortran-4.3.x.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-The patch below fixes a crash building libgfortran on arm-linux-gnueabi.
-
-This target doesn't really have a 128-bit integer type, however it does use 
-TImode to represent the return value of certain special ABI defined library 
-functions. This results in type_for_size(TImode) being called.
-
-Because TImode deosn't correspond to any gfortran integer kind 
-gfc_type_for_size returns NULL and we segfault shortly after.
-
-The patch below fixes this by making gfc_type_for_size handle TImode in the 
-same way as the C frontend.
-
-Tested on x86_64-linux and arm-linux-gnueabi.
-Applied to trunk.
-
-Paul
-
-2007-05-15  Paul Brook  <paul@codesourcery.com>
-
-        gcc/fortran/
-        * trans-types.c (gfc_type_for_size): Handle signed TImode.
-
-Index: gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
-===================================================================
---- gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (revision 170435)
-+++ gcc-4.2.1/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (working copy)
-@@ -1800,6 +1800,13 @@ gfc_type_for_size (unsigned bits, int un
-          if (type && bits == TYPE_PRECISION (type))
-            return type;
-        }
-+
-+      /* Handle TImode as a special case because it is used by some backends
-+         (eg. ARM) even though it is not available for normal use.  */
-+#if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT >= 65
-+      if (bits == TYPE_PRECISION (intTI_type_node))
-+       return intTI_type_node;
-+#endif
-     }
-   else
-     {