gcc-4.6: Migrate recipes from OE-Core

Remove linaro patches. If one needs to use linaro
modified gcc they should use meta-linaro

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 51 deletions

diff --git a/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch b/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 4c573f401e..0000000000
--- a/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106720.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-2011-02-21  Andrew Stubbs  <ams@codesourcery.com>
-            Julian Brown  <julian@codesourcery.com>
-            Mark Shinwell  <shinwell@codesourcery.com>
-
-        Forward-ported from Linaro GCC 4.5 (bzr99324).
-
-        gcc/
-        * config/arm/arm.h (arm_class_likely_spilled_p): Check against
-        LO_REGS only for Thumb-1.
-        (MODE_BASE_REG_CLASS): Restrict base registers to those which can
-        be used in short instructions when optimising for size on Thumb-2.
-
-=== modified file 'gcc/config/arm/arm.c'
---- old/gcc/config/arm/arm.c    2011-01-29 03:20:57 +0000
-+++ new/gcc/config/arm/arm.c    2011-02-21 14:04:51 +0000
-@@ -22304,14 +22304,16 @@
- 
- /* Implement TARGET_CLASS_LIKELY_SPILLED_P.
-  
--   We need to define this for LO_REGS on thumb.  Otherwise we can end up
--   using r0-r4 for function arguments, r7 for the stack frame and don't
--   have enough left over to do doubleword arithmetic.  */
--
-+   We need to define this for LO_REGS on Thumb-1.  Otherwise we can end up
-+   using r0-r4 for function arguments, r7 for the stack frame and don't have
-+   enough left over to do doubleword arithmetic.  For Thumb-2 all the
-+   potentially problematic instructions accept high registers so this is not
-+   necessary.  Care needs to be taken to avoid adding new Thumb-2 patterns
-+   that require many low registers.  */
- static bool
- arm_class_likely_spilled_p (reg_class_t rclass)
- {
--  if ((TARGET_THUMB && rclass == LO_REGS)
-+  if ((TARGET_THUMB1 && rclass == LO_REGS)
-       || rclass  == CC_REG)
-     return true;
- 
-
-=== modified file 'gcc/config/arm/arm.h'
---- old/gcc/config/arm/arm.h    2011-01-29 03:20:57 +0000
-+++ new/gcc/config/arm/arm.h    2011-02-21 14:04:51 +0000
-@@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@
-    when addressing quantities in QI or HI mode; if we don't know the
-    mode, then we must be conservative.  */
- #define MODE_BASE_REG_CLASS(MODE)                                      \
--    (TARGET_32BIT ? CORE_REGS :                                        \
-+    (TARGET_ARM || (TARGET_THUMB2 && !optimize_size) ? CORE_REGS :      \
-      (((MODE) == SImode) ? BASE_REGS : LO_REGS))
- 
- /* For Thumb we can not support SP+reg addressing, so we return LO_REGS
-